'Na Dina take: What can we say, when someone of Indian origins starts writing their views or opinions on the Fiji saga. They will of course write from their perspectives just as we do from ours whichever way it is viewed and/or interepreted. Thats the beauty of writing blogs. We get the readers to make up their own minds, thoughts shared are often mingled with what we will throw in as our own just to add a twist to the tale.Its all very well to engage in the 'war of words' as the case seems to be. What we cannot get over is how those of Indian origins and those who are others that are so hellbent in beating up any signs of Fijians rising to that of being a succesful business men/women etc. They are immediately shot down. Take for instance, Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase, a banker & a business man who won his seat through a fair election process. Now he is being blatantly accused of many things and yet have not been proven guilty in a Court of Law. To make matters worse, in his effort to teach Fijians i.e his own people, the art of business, he was quickly throttle by guess who?? Yes, you know who we are referring to here. There will always be a Fijian perspectives to the Fiji sorry saga & there will always be the Coolie/Indian perspectives as well as others. Thats for you as readers to owrk out amongst yourselves. One thing is for sure. Fijians are here to stay and 'Fight we will"!!Another, case in point, the author of the article below, as published by Keep the Faith in Intelligentsiya, written and articulated by a Fiji Indian who has his origins from the famous Indian Coolies that were imported to Fiji to work the sugar cane farms. True, they have educated themselves well and have moved on to greener pastures i.e now living abroad and yet cannot leave Fijians alone to try and make sense of whats going on back home. Not so recently, most Fijians holding key positions in governement were axed from their jobs. Prior to this their Fiji National Provident Funds (FNPF) were frozen due to some dodgy deals via some Fiji Indian sitting in Auckland, New Zealand, linking up with Blue Chips. These dodgy business men had inner connections to another 'coollie factor' /Fiji Indian sitting under a Minister in the then Fiji Governement, who signed off the deal for FNPF Funds to be transferred to the Momi Bay Resort which went bankrupt. As the world have heard, Fijian who are not great business men/women who held senior posts in Fiji government as doctors, teachers, draftsman, architectures, police, administrators, nurses, health workers were given limited time to exit from being a civil servants with not even a 'golden-pen' after many years of service. The question of their National Provident Funds which they had worked hard for all their lives to assist them in their retirement were all lost to the dodgy deals in Momi Bay Resort plus Blue Chip deals. So who are tehse dodgy people pulling the strings from behind the scene??
This story is enough to give an ordinary Fijian who has been educated to see for themselves how Fijians are being "stitched up"!! So whats Karam Ramarakh is saying now? Do they really want to see Fijians go under by depriving them of the joys of being in their home turf?Ramrakha claims European Unions is sitting on the fence with Bainimarama's bad calls on Fiji's economy and the mess Fiji is in? Show us the facts. The last we heard EU had instructed Bainimarama & his illegal cronies to return Fiji back to normalcy. So what is Ramrakha going on about?Time to just ease-off and allow Roko Ului to proceed with his roadmap on Fiji from outside Fiji.
Many of the so-called descendants of Coollies have trully left Fiji with little intention of going back. They do not send money back to help Fiji's coffers. If for anything they take money out of Fiji. That is a fact. The slightest opportunity one gets to migrate, they take it.So what we are saying, leave Fiji alone and stop yourrhetorics and 'bulls***t'. Just because you are lawyers or professionals does not give you any more right to be claiming you know Fiji best thus claiming a piece of Fiji. If you intend to re-invest or leave money there in Fiji, then its all good, but unfortunately the stories are the same. As business men/women all one wants are to go in make your money, rob Fiji & its people & run!! Na Dina' Fiji Truth will Prevail in the end.Fiji Truth Commission Movement.---------------------------------------------
Read more:
from
Intelligentsiya by Keep The Faith
Well looky-look what we have here.
The illegal and treasonous military regime and their supporters and
inept mouthpieces have been
sent their brief to seize the hearts and minds of Melanesia via the
Solomon Star media outlet, hoping in their artificiality, that their
lone supporter will help them
apprehend and
score points over regional Fiji's fugitive
drama.
Unfortunately for them the tide tends to turn
very swiftly in Melanesia.
Double standards over Mara, MotiWednesday, 22 June 2011 04:19
How does the saying go? Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. So far Fiji’s Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama has enjoyed an untroubled run.
He has the country firmly under his thumb. Dissenting forces, or areas of possible dissent, have been neutralised. For once no one is cursing the Indo-Fijians for Fiji’s problems.
The two coups of 1987 and 2000 were based on supposed indo-fijian takeover of Fiji and stated to be the saviour of the embattled indigenous Fijian race.
But Commodore Bainimarama’s agenda is different.
Graham Davis, a Fiji-born journalist, when accused of supporting a coup summed the position thus:
“
I believe there’s a fundamental difference between the coups of 2000 and 2006.The former was supposedly a coup to uphold indigenous rights but, in fact, seems to have been carried out by a group of opportunists pursuing the spoils of office.
What’s the evidence for that? That indigenous rights weren’t under any threat. It was a smokescreen for a much more grubby lunge for power.
The coup of 2006 - on the other hand - was to uphold the notion of a multiracial Fiji against what the military believed to be a clear and present threat.
This was the legislative programme of the Qarase government that would have created two nations - one for indigenous Fijians and one for the rest.”I endorse his remarks.To seek to achieve that goal Commodore Bainimarama has had to pull out all stops and, for the time being, stifle or silence all dissent .
It began, of course, with parliament itself. As we see in Australia today, parliament continues to reflect a nation evenly divided.
Qarase had won a majority with a blatantly racial approach to i-Taukei Fijians to vote on racial lines.He denied this, of course, but a tape recording of one of his speeches caught him out. Qarase persisted with that blatantly racial agenda.He sought to declare all sea and shores of Fiji as indigenous land; he wanted the 2000 coup perpetrators “reconciled” and thus forgiven; and finally he sought every i-Taukei outside Fiji to have a vote.
After months or warnings including a “settlement” conference in New Zealand, Commodore Bainimarama acted on December 6, 2006.
Commodore Bainimarama would go on to neutralise the Fiji Law Society, the Council of Chiefs and finally the Methodist Church.T
There has been unrelenting pressure on Commodore Bainimarama to hold elections.
Commodore Bainimarama does not want those who I may call “the usual suspects” to end up in parliament.
Fundamental to Commodore Bainimarama’s success is loyalty of the military - the only single political force that remains in Fiji.
Speculation abounds. The world powers - USA, UK, EU, Australia and New Zealand - are pressing Frank for a return to civilian government.
Commodore Bainimarama originally promised elections in 2009, but has extended this date to 2014.
Commodore Bainimarama does not want any of the “old guard” to come back to parliament.
Commodore Bainimarama does not want any discrimination. Frank wants one-man, one-vote, one-value. Equality for all. Very high and noble motives.
The European Union is somewhat neutral to Commodore Bainimarama. China is silent and it is one country which shuns political decisions in cases such as Fiji.
China is there to lend a helping hand, but excites the envy of other nations who shun Fiji.
But the West is suddenly becoming strident despite showing some signs recently that Commodore Bainimarama should be accommodated and “understood.”
A recent drama, where a soldier accused of sedition has been spirited to Tonga in a Tongan vessel which brazenly entered Fiji’s waters.
Unlike Julian Moti (Fiji-born former Solomon Islands’ Attorney-General) who was hunted like a fugitive by Australia, this soldier Ratu Tevita Mara has been made welcome in Tonga and Australia where he was invited to deliver a speech.
Suddenly the Machiavellian doctrine that the enemy of my enemy is my friend is being invoked.
Why did Australia give Ratu Ului a visa? On what basis? Australia is very selective in choosing who will come to Australia.
Unlike Julian Moti, Roko Ului was actually a fugitive from Fiji’s judicial and legal system.
Remember the American CIA ? As one of its operatives confessed to a Fiji journalist, “The purpose of the CIA is to foster unrest in the rest of the world.”
Yes, indeed, while the rest of the world is squabbling and disunited Uncle Sam rules.
Remember Indira Gandhi’s wheat sales to USA which paid her in Indian rupees.
Yes, rupees which could only be spent in India. The CIA used that money to bribe and destabilise. Mrs Gandhi cancelled the deal.
Remember Kwame Nkrumah.
The CIA admits it had him killed. Nkrumah’s crime: he would have united Africa.
So Australia and New Zealand are playing the same CIA game and marching to its beat. Divide and conquer. Conquer and divide.
We watch how the Ratu Ului drama will pan out. Tonga once nearly conquered Fiji.
Tongan chief Ma’afu who tried to conquer Fiji is buried in Fiji at Ratu Ului’s home in Lau.
Parts of Lau speak Tongan.
Yes, if anything, this dispute highlights the reality of Commodore Bainimarama’s dream of a free Fiji with equality for all.
By: Karam Chand Ramrakha*
In Sydney, Australia
*Karam Ramrakha, a lawyer admitted to practice in Fiji and New South Wales, draws on his experiences as a former Fiji parliamentarian and one of the “Founding Fathers of Free Fiji” to analyse recent events.